Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alt-art information? #123

Open
Smashman opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Alt-art information? #123

Smashman opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@Smashman
Copy link
Contributor

Smashman commented Oct 7, 2016

Perhaps cards with alt-arts could have some amount of information?

Depending on if we're expecting cards to receive more than a single alt-art across the lifespan of the game, it could be a simple boolean, or an integer detailing how many alt-arts exist.

@jdcowf
Copy link

jdcowf commented Apr 24, 2017

This would allow deck building based on inventory. If I had 2 AA PolOp's but didn't have Democracy and Dogma my deck building app could still show me 2 PolOp's being available for construction.

If we're going down this road it may be worthwhile to add a field for full bleed artworks and acrylics versions of cards. This is likely less useful than the above situation since the full bleeds are currently only in packs, but could be beneficial to someone.

@NoahTheDuke
Copy link
Collaborator

If we wanted to track this, I'd want it to be normalized: Make a "table" of releases (Region 2014, Worlds 2018, etc), make a table of "alt" kind (acrylic, full-bleed, etc), make a join table of card-by-name to release to kind.

Having a canonical listing of every single alt in existence would be sweet. With the 600 dpi scans, we have nearly everything already, so linking the two would be very helpful for the community.

@Smashman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did some work on this, when I suggested it. I could dig it out and let you take a look.

@NoahTheDuke
Copy link
Collaborator

That would be killer, yes! Thank you so much.

@x3N1GM4x
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, there'd obv be some data structure work here and it might be something that feeds into the planned schema rebuild quite neatly, but either way, I'm 100% behind this as an idea. 👍

@plural
Copy link
Collaborator

plural commented Jun 30, 2022

We are definitely going to add this, but it will be in the second wave of NRDB v2 updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants