Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature]: Deprecate creating SoftLinks with a path argument #645

Open
2 tasks done
ehennestad opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

[Feature]: Deprecate creating SoftLinks with a path argument #645

ehennestad opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features priority: low alternative solution already working and/or relevant to only specific user(s) status: todo something needs to be done topic: matnwb-api related to improving the matnwb api

Comments

@ehennestad
Copy link
Collaborator

What would you like to see added to MatNWB?

Add warning for using string (path name) in SoftLink

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No response

What solution would you like?

Add warning for using string (path name) in SoftLink

Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?

Yes.

Code of Conduct
@ehennestad ehennestad added priority: low alternative solution already working and/or relevant to only specific user(s) category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features status: todo something needs to be done topic: matnwb-api related to improving the matnwb api labels Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
category: proposal discussion of proposed enhancements or new features priority: low alternative solution already working and/or relevant to only specific user(s) status: todo something needs to be done topic: matnwb-api related to improving the matnwb api
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ehennestad