Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using one opam package for the library, the binary and the parsers #910

Closed
Halbaroth opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Using one opam package for the library, the binary and the parsers #910

Halbaroth opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
backlog build

Comments

@Halbaroth
Copy link
Collaborator

We publish 4 opam packages for the project now. It makes sense to publish plugins in separate packages as they can used different licenses.

It'll be simpler to publish the binary, the library and the legacy parsers in a single opam file.

(suggested by @bclement-ocp offline)
@Halbaroth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Solved by #1251. We have only two packages now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backlog build
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Halbaroth @bclement-ocp