Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comprehensive way to manage ReSolve configuration parameters #96

Open
pelesh opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #163
Open

Comprehensive way to manage ReSolve configuration parameters #96

pelesh opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #163
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@pelesh
Copy link
Collaborator

pelesh commented Dec 2, 2023

ReSolve includes several different linear solvers and supports three hardware backends. There is a large number of parameters in ReSolve to select specific solution strategy and to tune its performance. Many of the parameters are specific to a specific solver type or hardware backend or both. We need a hierarchical method to allow user to configure ReSolve easily without sifting through dozens of (often cryptically described) parameters. Most of these parameters need to be set at runtime.

This issue is to start discussion how to handle this most effectively.

The issue originally raised by @kswirydo in #86 (comment)_

@pelesh pelesh added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Dec 2, 2023
@pelesh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pelesh commented Dec 3, 2023

Another part of this discussion is how to implement interface to ReSolve's select-from-the-list options. Currently we are just passing strings as this is quick'n'dirty way to set those options and get everything running. Perhaps a better way is to expose those lists to users in a form of enums. This will require some thinking about the scope in which these enums will live.

See how we handled similar issue in #12.

Also suggested by @kswirydo in #86 (comment)_

@pelesh pelesh linked a pull request Jun 13, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants