-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About Eq. (1.26) in section "Implicit methods" #2
Comments
you are right -- that's a typo (the n instead of n+1). The proper superscript appears in 1.28. I'll think about the notation issue as well. |
I found another two typos:
Sorry for my trivial comments on small things. :-) |
Maybe another typo in Exercise 3.10 at here:
Maybe the original meaning is "you may find less second-order since your initial conditions have discontinuities and you are limiting"? |
About Figure 3.13 (tex code here): Thanks! |
yes, you are right about FIgure 3.13. I've explicitly added several different limiters to that plot now. |
Seems another typo in Eq. (3.58):
Thank you! :-) |
yes, you are correct |
I believe that Eq. (1.26) at here does not want expansions on time. I think the superscript of "t" on the right hand side should be changed from "n" to "n+1".
PS: I think the subscript of the Jacobin matrix, "0", may be a little confusing since the matrix uses digits (1-n) as the subscriptions of its elements. Maybe a few more explanations will make it clearer. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: