You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some questions about reader_netCDF_CF_unstructured.py code.
If you look at the get_variable function, there is a slight difference between node_variable and face_variable in the part that fetches the data at the closest point to the particle position.
The node_variables says to extract the required data using sigma_ind when dvar.dimensions has 'siglev'.
On the other hand, face_variables use sigma_ind to extract data when 'siglay' is in the variable dimension.
In my opinion, if node_variables, face_variables, or depth dimensions exist, they can all use 'siglay' the same, but what made them set them differently? Is there any special reason?
face_variable interpolating
node_variable interpolating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I made this change because siglay was for face_variables and siglev was for node variables, otherwise the dimensions did not match up. But it has been a while since I did this.
I have some questions about reader_netCDF_CF_unstructured.py code.
If you look at the get_variable function, there is a slight difference between node_variable and face_variable in the part that fetches the data at the closest point to the particle position.
The node_variables says to extract the required data using sigma_ind when dvar.dimensions has 'siglev'.
On the other hand, face_variables use sigma_ind to extract data when 'siglay' is in the variable dimension.
In my opinion, if node_variables, face_variables, or depth dimensions exist, they can all use 'siglay' the same, but what made them set them differently? Is there any special reason?
face_variable interpolating
node_variable interpolating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: