-
Hello, I came across the CCBlade application, but I am not sure if it can meet my requirements, and I think I need an expert opinion on this. Thank you for your time. Best regards. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 11 replies
-
Dear @teocar, Regarding AeroDyn, some releases of OpenFAST, including the newest v3.5.4, include a precompiled Windows executable of the standalone AeroDyn driver, so, a Fortran compiler may not be needed. Regardless, Fortran compilers and freely available and NREL has provided the scripts needed to compile the standalone AeroDyn driver, as documented here: https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/main/source/install/index.html. You can also run rigid wind turbine simulations within OpenFAST, but this will not be as efficient and will be harder to set-up than the standalone AeroDyn driver. To model a fully rigid wind turbine in OpenFAST, disable ServoDyn, BeamDyn, SubDyn, as well as all structural degrees of freedom within ElastoDyn. CCBlade is a simplified model compared to the standalone AeroDyn driver. If steady aerodynamic-only performance under uniform inflow is what you are after, the standalone AeroDyn driver and CCBlade should yield similar results, but the standard AeroDyn driver is better for skewed inflow, turbulence, and transient events. Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear @jjonkman ; As you mentioned, the Aerodyn driver has been helpful, and I am grateful for that. Additionally, I am comparing my results with the literature, particularly with some BEM and CFD solutions that I have found in articles so far. Is there any report available where I can compare my results? Thank you for your support.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear @jjonkman; Is there a forum that can help me with the problem I encountered with Numad or should I open it here again under a different tag? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Dear @teocar,
I’ve sent you the files via e-mail.
Best regards,