issues about hydrodyn damping #873
Replies: 3 comments
-
Dear @XinmengZeng, The additional linear stiffness ( When validating your OpenFAST model, I would suggest first setting I hope that helps. Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear @jjonkman Best wishes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear @XinmengZeng, The quadratic drag matrix and the hydrodynamic drag coefficients are not the same thing, but they have similarities. The similarity is that they are both quadratic in nature (proportional to v*ABS(v), where "v" is the velocity). However, the hydrodynamic drag model in the strip-theory solution is based on the relative velocity between the wave particles and structure and may also consider structural flexibility, whereas the quadratic drag matrix does not consider wave kinematics and only applies to rigid bodies. Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have confused about the additional linear stiffness and linear damping and quadratic damping for monopile and floating.
If i have three free decay time history about surge\heave\pitch through expriment or CFD, Using PQ damping method to get P and Q and equivalent linear damping ratio, how to setting the three matrix?
And if i did not have the free decay,the three matrix is it for zero?
How about monopile?
And the quadratic damping matrix is it conflict with HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS below,and it is must choose one only?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions