Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
We're currently mainly using the DEA data with some additional data from various sources. All of these sources already make assumptions on learning (if not progressive, then at least the "no learning" assumption). Adding such a functionality might increase the risk of misuse, e.g. applying learning rates twice to the same technology. What you can do:
(Not an opinion, just a remark ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Would it make sense to add a script that can handle learning rates of different shape per technology?
For instance, let's assume I find a dataset for 2030 including costs for new technologies. Now, I want to run PyPSA for 2050 which means at the moment that the cost will be adjusted to 2050 by an overall identical inflation rate (2%). In the best case, the user would like to have the option to create costs for each technology based on a "learning by learning factor" and a "learning by deployment factor" (i.e. Kittner & Kammen 2017, Nature paper).
The need for such an option might be not there so much for established technologies since many publications share long-term data for that purpose, however, when exploring novel technologies this might desirable function :)
Happy to contribute this in early summer, since I would need this!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions