-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow earlier versions of rdflib #219
Comments
I guess this can be closed since there are |
Yes, go ahead and close
…On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:43 AM Philipp D. Rohde ***@***.***> wrote:
I guess this can be closed since there are rdflib releases 6.2.x, 6.3.x,
and 7.0.x by now, right?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#219 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOJVXQ4EJCGLWJ5GFTLX3WBXPANCNFSM5U4LKT4Q>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
sparqlwrapper requires rdflib >= 6.1.1
I am using a library that uses rdflib6 but intentionally pins to exclude rdflib 6.1.1
https://github.com/hsolbrig/funowl/blob/main/Pipfile
The reason for the pinning is that the rdflib 6.1.x series polluted the rdflib namespaces which broke various tests
This was fixed in rdflib
RDFLib/rdflib#1686
However, there has not yet been a new release of rdflib
Does sparqlwrapper truly require >= 6.1.1 or could it be relaxed to 6.0.x and higher?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: