You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently only investor_name column is used to filter peer data in techexposure, techexposure_future and trajectory_alignment. I consider this not to be robust given that later in the charts it is the portfolio_name column that is used to display the peer_group name. In principle, for aggregated peer results both of these columns should be equal and I think that the filter should be applied to both.
Currently only
investor_name
column is used to filter peer data intechexposure
,techexposure_future
andtrajectory_alignment
. I consider this not to be robust given that later in the charts it is the portfolio_name column that is used to display the peer_group name. In principle, for aggregated peer results both of these columns should be equal and I think that the filter should be applied to both.Migration of https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.interactive.report/issues/154
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: