You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
and control the arm directly using the /arm_controller/joint_trajectory topic. When I send the first command then it leads to an abrupt start as follows:
If this flag is set, the controller tries to read the values from the command interfaces on activation. If they have real numeric values, those will be used instead of state interfaces. Therefore it is important set command interfaces to NaN (i.e., std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN()) or state values when the hardware is started.
Setting open_loop_control to false fixes the issue.
Why is open_loop_control is active? Is a feedback from the hardware interface not better?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ROBOTIS-Will will Turtlebot3 receive any updates in the future for ROS2?
Background: Currently most of the effort seems to be driven by the community, however Turtlebot3 has a complex infrastructure, which is difficult to understand/contribute. If Turtlebot3 won't receive any focus from your dev team in the near future, please state this in your README, or pin an issue.
I use
and control the arm directly using the
/arm_controller/joint_trajectory
topic. When I send the first command then it leads to an abrupt start as follows:This behavior is probably due to:
turtlebot3_manipulation/turtlebot3_manipulation_bringup/config/gazebo_controller_manager.yaml
Line 45 in 3baa265
ROS2 Control docs state:
Setting
open_loop_control
tofalse
fixes the issue.Why is
open_loop_control
is active? Is a feedback from the hardware interface not better?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: