[lldb][DWARF] Sort ranges list in dwarf 5. (llvm#91343)

Dwarf 5 says "There is no requirement that the entries be ordered in any
particular way" in 2.17.3 Non-Contiguous Address Ranges for rnglist.
Some places assume the ranges are already sorted but it's not.

For example, when [parsing function
info](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/bc8a42762057d7036f6871211e62b1c3efb2738a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp#L922-L927),
it validates low and hi address of the function: GetMinRangeBase returns
the first range entry base and GetMaxRangeEnd returns the last range
end. If low >= hi, it stops parsing this function. This causes missing
inline stack frames for those functions.

This change fixes it and updates the test
`lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/debug_rnglists.s` so that two
ranges in `.debug_rnglists` are out of order and `image lookup -v -s
lookup_rnglists` is still able to produce sorted ranges for the inner
block.

lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp

@@ -1062,6 +1062,7 @@ DWARFUnit::FindRnglistFromOffset(dw_offset_t offset) {
  ranges.Append(DWARFRangeList::Entry(llvm_range.LowPC,
  llvm_range.HighPC - llvm_range.LowPC));
  }
+ ranges.Sort();
  return ranges;
 }
 

lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/debug_rnglists.s

@@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ lookup_rnglists2:
 .Lrnglists_table_base0:
  .long .Ldebug_ranges0-.Lrnglists_table_base0
 .Ldebug_ranges0:
- .byte 4 # DW_RLE_offset_pair
- .uleb128 .Lblock1_begin-rnglists # starting offset
- .uleb128 .Lblock1_end-rnglists # ending offset
  .byte 4 # DW_RLE_offset_pair
  .uleb128 .Lblock2_begin-rnglists # starting offset
  .uleb128 .Lblock2_end-rnglists # ending offset
+ .byte 4 # DW_RLE_offset_pair
+ .uleb128 .Lblock1_begin-rnglists # starting offset
+ .uleb128 .Lblock1_end-rnglists # ending offset
  .byte 0 # DW_RLE_end_of_list
 .Ldebug_rnglist_table_end0: