Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

frog_crab #52

Open
LingMan opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

frog_crab #52

LingMan opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request vectorization 🐸! frog!

Comments

@LingMan
Copy link

LingMan commented May 4, 2023

Unless I'm blind again this staple of frogging culture is missing:
frog_crab

@Miepee Miepee added enhancement New feature or request 🐸! frog! vectorization labels May 4, 2023
@Riesi
Copy link
Owner

Riesi commented May 5, 2023

@Miepee do you have any improvement ideas over the crab shape or should I just go ahead and do an initial vector PR
Reviews can be done over the vectorized version still

@Miepee
Copy link
Collaborator

Miepee commented May 5, 2023

I personally prefer if the twemoji crab would be used rather than the random clipart, for consistency with other emojis. Although the "feel" of that is pretty different so people might not like it as much.
grafik

Apart from that, not really though

@Riesi
Copy link
Owner

Riesi commented May 5, 2023

I would prefer a more ferris like version
But we can always do 2 versions
one for logos/ and one in root

image

https://rustacean.net/

@Riesi
Copy link
Owner

Riesi commented May 5, 2023

I guess I will do the ferris one for now, since it has the most applications.

@Miepee
Copy link
Collaborator

Miepee commented May 5, 2023

A ferris variant is fine by me.

@Riesi
Copy link
Owner

Riesi commented May 5, 2023

Ok
lets see how that will pan out
we can move to 2 versions later anyways

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request vectorization 🐸! frog!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants