You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the attached file, nfsim and ssa/ode simulations produce different results. The cause is likely to be in the reverse reaction
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr
NFSim becomes confused between
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr where B and C
where C and A are not bound together and
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) .C(c1) kr
Where C and A still maintain a bond. While network expansion distinguishes between the two correctly and only triggers the event specified by the user.
In the attached file, nfsim and ssa/ode simulations produce different results. The cause is likely to be in the reverse reaction
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr
NFSim becomes confused between
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr where B and C
where C and A are not bound together and
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) .C(c1) kr
Where C and A still maintain a bond. While network expansion distinguishes between the two correctly and only triggers the event specified by the user.
odevsnf.bngl.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: