Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove example for Media Type as it is confusing #110

Open
jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Remove example for Media Type as it is confusing #110

jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 status:fixed Resolution applied in draft type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar

Comments

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

jakubklimek commented Mar 8, 2024

Problem statement
The Example for Media type is confusing:

[] a dcat:Distribution ;
  dct:format [ a dct:MediaType ;
      rdfs:label "Geopackage" ] .
  1. It shows dct:format, which must be used with the File Type EU NAL, i.e. it cannot be used like this with a blank node.
  2. The range of dct:format is not dct:MediaType, but dct:MediaTypeOrExtent.

The examples should be given for usages of Media Type in properties, not for the Media Type itself, as the actual recommended approach is to use the Media Type IRI, not its representation as a blank node.

Proposal

  1. Delete this example.
  2. Add an example for dct:format and dcat:mediaType
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar status:resolution-proposed Resolution proposed and will be accepted before the next webinar labels Mar 8, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added the next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar label Mar 21, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added status:resolution-provided Resolution statement present, not yet applied in draft and removed status:resolution-proposed Resolution proposed and will be accepted before the next webinar labels Apr 16, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek removed the next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar label Apr 25, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added status:fixed Resolution applied in draft and removed status:resolution-provided Resolution statement present, not yet applied in draft labels Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 status:fixed Resolution applied in draft type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant