Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve notes on using embedded objects vs. references #111

Open
jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Improve notes on using embedded objects vs. references #111

jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related future-work To be dealt with in the next iteration status:postponed Decision postponed type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar

Comments

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

Problem statement
Properties listed for supporting classes like Standard are probably meant to be used when an IRI of the instance of the class cannot be determined and such an instance needs to be described by these properties as an embedded object instead. When such an IRI is known, there should be no need to use the descriptive properties.

However, this approach is not explicitly described anywhere in GeoDCAT-AP, causing confusion, like in #109 .

Proposal
Explicitly mention that the properties are to be used with and embedded object when IRI of the instance of the class is unknown, which may be result of a mapping from a source which does not containt them.

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar labels Mar 8, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar and removed next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar labels Mar 21, 2024
@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lifting to Style Guide discussion proposed during the webinar. Issue postponed.

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added status:postponed Decision postponed feedback-requested Community feedback requested labels Mar 21, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek removed the feedback-requested Community feedback requested label Apr 25, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added the alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related label May 8, 2024
@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related issue SEMICeu/LDES-DCAT-AP-feeds#17

@jakubklimek jakubklimek removed the release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 label May 10, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added the future-work To be dealt with in the next iteration label Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related future-work To be dealt with in the next iteration status:postponed Decision postponed type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant