Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reference system mapped to dct:conformsTo #94

Open
jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Reference system mapped to dct:conformsTo #94

jakubklimek opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 status:fixed Resolution applied in draft type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar

Comments

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

Problem statement
In GeoDCAT-AP 2.0.0, the Reference system property on

is mapped to the generic dct:conformsTo, which is also present on the same classes, both having dct:Standard as range.

This makes correct assignment of usage notes, labels and the required code lists rather difficult, as well as consequent validation e.g. via SHACL.
The current approach is not in line with the profiling guidelines established in the context of the SEMIC Style Guide property reuse guideline Reuse of a property with terminological adaptations and Reuse of a property with semantic adaptations.
Also, the approach becomes even more problematic in a cross-profile environment where incompatible requirements can be easily made.

The reference system usage note says e.g. This property SHOULD be used to specify the reference system used in the Catalogue. Spatial reference systems SHOULD be specified by using the corresponding URIs from the “EPSG coordinate reference systems” register operated by OGC [OGC-EPSG].

The dct:conformsTo usage note says e.g. This property refers to an implementing rule or other specification.

Proposal
Either

  1. Merge the usage notes to the generic dct:conformsTo to make it clear that reference systems are one kind of the Standards expected as values here, or
  2. Introduce a profile specific subproperty of dct:conformsTo geodcatap:referenceSystem and attach the separate usage notes there.
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar labels Mar 3, 2024
@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Posponed until the next webinar

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar status:postponed Decision postponed feedback-requested Community feedback requested labels Mar 21, 2024
@joachimnielandt
Copy link

Related issue / information: #115

@joachimnielandt
Copy link

As an applicable example, in Flanders we refer to the standard accompanied by a unique identifier. An example conformsTo element that refers to a standard is given below:

<dct:conformsTo>
        <dct:Standard rdf:about="https://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EjjPSG/0/5710">
                <dct:title>Ostend height</dct:title>
                <dct:identifier>https://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/5710</dct:identifier>
                <dct:type rdf:resource="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/glossary/SpatialReferenceSystem"/>
        </dct:Standard>
</dct:conformsTo>

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added status:resolution-provided Resolution statement present, not yet applied in draft and removed next-webinar To be discussed in the next webinar status:postponed Decision postponed labels Apr 25, 2024
@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor Author

A subproperty will be created.

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added status:fixed Resolution applied in draft and removed feedback-requested Community feedback requested status:resolution-provided Resolution statement present, not yet applied in draft labels May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
alignment:style-guide SEMIC Style Guide alignment related release:3.0.0 Actively being worked on for GeoDCAT-AP 3.0.0 status:fixed Resolution applied in draft type:improvement Improvement of current handling of a problem webinar:2024-03-12 To be discussed in the 2024-03-12 webinar webinar:2024-04-23 To be discussed in the 2024-04-23 webinar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants