You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the downscaleCV method uses 12603% of one CPU and TOO SLOW why?
A 30*40 box of ERA-I dataset was used to downscaling dataset is small enough why take so many resource???
here is the cenos7 top result:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
553757 inspur 20 0 105.6g 74.1g 28200 R 12603 7.4 440:22.97 R
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
options(java.parameters = "-Xmx8g")
library(climate4R.UDG)
library(loadeR)
library(loadeR.2nc)
library(transformeR)
library(climate4R.datasets)
library(downscaleR)
library(visualizeR)
library(VALUE)
library(climate4R.value)
vars <- c("var151","var165","var166") #psl; uas; vas
varp <- c("var131@85000","var132@85000","var129@50000") #131-ua; 132-va; 130-ta; 129-zg;
grid.list <- lapply(vars, function(x) {
loadGridData(dataset =
"/home/inspur/working/climate4r/ERA-I/box_surface_interim_1979_2018.nc",
var = x,
years = 1990:2018)
}
)
grid.listp <- lapply(varp, function(x) {
loadGridData(dataset =
"/home/inspur/working/climate4r/ERA-I/box_pressure_interim_1979_2018.nc",
var = x,
years = 1990:2018)
}
)
pred <- downscaleCV(xs, wsobs, folds = 3, sampling.strategy = "kfold.chronological",
scaleGrid.args = list(type = "standardize"),
method = "GLM",
prepareData.args = list(
"spatial.predictors" = list(which.combine = getVarNames(xs), v.exp = 0.9)))
the downscaleCV method uses 12603% of one CPU and TOO SLOW why?
A 30*40 box of ERA-I dataset was used to downscaling dataset is small enough why take so many resource???
here is the cenos7 top result:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
553757 inspur 20 0 105.6g 74.1g 28200 R 12603 7.4 440:22.97 R
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: