From 4f7eedcfbe282c99e31e83f65bfeaed9e2138b52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Avik Pal Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:17:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] docs: update performance wording --- docs/src/index.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/src/index.md b/docs/src/index.md index d1d5f027f..cb03453d2 100644 --- a/docs/src/index.md +++ b/docs/src/index.md @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ the precision of the arguments are correct, and anything that requires alternati `ForwardDiffSensitivity` dual numbers) are suspect. Lux.jl has none of these issues, is simpler to work with due to the parameters in its function calls being explicit rather than implicit global -references, and achieves higher performance. It is built on the same foundations as Flux.jl, such as Zygote and NNLib, and thus it supports the -same layers underneath and calls the same kernels. The better performance comes from not having the overhead of `restructure` required. -Thus we highly recommend people use Lux instead and only use the Flux fallbacks for legacy code. +references, and achieves higher performance. It is built on similar foundations as Flux.jl, such as Zygote and NNLib. The better performance +comes from not having the overhead of `restructure` required and fusing common operations in LuxLib.jl. Thus we highly recommend people use +Lux instead and only use the Flux fallbacks for legacy code. ## Citation