-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regridder unification tasks #211
Comments
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 90 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 7 days time. |
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 90 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 7 days time. |
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 180 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 14 days time. |
📰 Custom Issue
The work being done in #198 can be separated into different pull requests:
ESMFAreaWeighted
andESMFAreaweightedRegridder
will be able to act as a replacement forMeshToGridESMFRegridder
/GridToMeshESMFRegridder
(along with the newESMFBilinear
class).MeshToGridESMFRegridder
andGridToMeshESMFRegridder
are likely to be deprecated after their functionality if fully replaced (they remain the only regridders able to be saved/loaded). (Refactor and unify regridding schemes #198)ESMFAreaweightedRegridder
,ESMFBilinearRegridder
andESMFNearestRegridder
. #318MeshToGridESMFRegridder
andGridToMeshESMFRegridder
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: