Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (58 loc) · 4.94 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (58 loc) · 4.94 KB
Raw

One-Shot Reachability Analysis of Neural Network Dynamical Systems: Is it Worth Verifying a Rollout Dynamics?

This repository compares the one-shot and recursive reachability analysis frameworks for discrete-time NN dynamical systems over a finite horizon. It contains examples from the paper:

One-shot reachability analysis of neural network dynamical systems
Shaoru Chen, Victor M. Preciado, Mahyar Fazlyab
2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Introduction

For a potentially uncertain NN dynamical system $x_{t+1} = f(x_t, w_t)$, it is often required to bound the reachable sets of it over a finite horizon given an initial set $x_0 \in X_0$ and bounded disturbance set $w_t \in W$. With the computed reachable set over-approximations, we can certify the reach-avoid properties of the NN system as shown in the figure above. The closed-loop NN dynamics may consist of various interconnected NN and uncertainty modules shown below:

and the goal is to obtain reachable set over-approximations $R_t$ of $x_t$ for $t= 0, 1, \cdots, T$ as tight as possible. Essentially, this can be reduced to a NN verification problem, but the selection of the computation graph matters. This repository compares two frameworks of conducting reachability analysis:

  1. Recursive Analysis: Derive reachable set over-approximation $R_{t+1}$ with $R_t$ as the input domain to the NN dynamics $x_{t+1} = f(x_t, w_t)$.
  2. One-Shot Analysis: Derive reachable set over-approximation $R_{t+1}$ with the initial set $X_0$ as the input domain to the rollout NN dynamics $x_{t+1} = f^{(t)}(x_0, w_0, w_1, \cdots, w_t)$.

Surprisingly, we found that the one-shot analysis does NOT always give tighter over-approximations even though it considers a larger computation graph for verification. Whether the one-shot method leads to tighter bounds depends on the applied NN verification method! As shown in the following example, with a backward bound propagation method, one-shot analysis gives tighter bounds. However, with a forward bound propagation method, one-shot analysis becomes much more conservative. The main question that we want to answer is: When is it worth verifying the rollout NN dynamics?

Bounding reachable sets of a 2D NN system using backward bound propagation.

Bounding reachable sets of a 2D NN system using forward bound propagation.

Main Results

The following results are provided in our paper:

  1. One-shot analysis is guaranteed to be tighter than the recursive counterpart if the applied NN verifier has a separable structure. This "separable" class of NN verifiers include popular ones such as those based on mixed-integer programming, linear programming-based verifiers, and backward bound propagation.
  2. The conservatism gap between the one-shot and recursive analysis comes from the concretization errors when a fixed bounding template (e.g., a polyhedron with specified hyperplanes) is used.
  3. With a separable NN verifier for reachability analysis, the rollout horizon can be treated as a design parameter. The choice of the bounding template is crucial but how to find a good one is an open problem.

This repository contains codes to recover the results reported in the main paper.

Installation and Running Examples

The following installation has been tested:

conda create -n nn_reach python=3.10
conda activate nn_reach

# Example: install pytorch on macOS. 
conda install pytorch==1.12.1 torchvision==0.13.1 torchaudio==0.12.1 -c pytorch

pip install auto-lirpa
conda install -c conda-forge cvxpy
conda install scipy
pip install -r requirements.txt

To generate Fig.3.a, run

python examples/duffing_oscillator/duffing_oscillator_propagation.py --method backward --one_shot_horizon 8 --recursive_horizon 3

To generate Fig.3.b, run

python examples/duffing_oscillator/duffing_oscillator_propagation.py --method forward --one_shot_horizon 3 --recursive_horizon 2

To generate Fig.4, run

python examples/duffing_oscillator/duffing_oscillator_LP.py

To generate Fig.6, run

python examples/cartpole/cartpole_propagation.py

Third-party dependence

We use auto-LiRPA to implement the bound propagation method to bound NN outputs.

We use pympc mainly for operations on polyhedron.