2.0.2 Assembly Version Is Wrong? #387
Unanswered
alecrodden
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
The version numbers actually conform to the guidelines. Please see the following documentation https://learn.microsoft.com/en-ca/dotnet/standard/library-guidance/versioning#version-numbers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
After upgrading to SixLabors.Fonts version 2.0.2, I noticed that
typeof(SixLabors.Fonts.TextMeasurer).Assembly.GetName().Version
is still returning 2.0.0. Here's the assembly info from dotPeek, where the file version is correct, but the assembly name still says 2.0.0:This isn't a huge deal for me, I just noticed it because my application happens to include this library's assembly version in the metadata of a generated PDF for debugging purposes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions