Replies: 4 comments 9 replies
-
The presence or not of a There are a couple of ways of tying the coverage report with what is actually being analysed -- for example looking at what the IL code looks like when decompiled with a tool like e.g. ILSpy, and finding where the [Theory] decoration has ended up; or by reconciling the coverage data with the actual code by line and column e.g. using the visualizer tool to paint the source with colours representing whether it's covered (blue), not covered (red) or not even considered for coverage (grey). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That, to coin a phrase, is blinking well baffling. If the above is a minimal repro, then, as this seems to involve a payware component, I'd be interested in examining the just instrumented test assembly and the associated XML, if at all possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I will try to extract the MVP and share it with you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have noticed that coverage of some of the methods that I know are executed during the test is missing. These methods are called from a
[Theory]
test method:I can see "everything" being visited/covered/recorded in the file with the collected coverage - the
ES008DALTest
constructor, the customCsvDataSource
to read the data from a CSV file, theES008Parameters
constructor. But not theES008DALTest
method.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions