How come this isn't just a simple desktop app? Why the need to self-host? #1218
-
I've been trying to find open source alternatives to as many proprietary apps as I can, and this came up as one such program for Adobe Acrobat. However, it seems that, in order to use it, there's a significant amount of technological overhead you need to get it running. That is, you need to set it up on some external server (maybe) and then either run it in a container or pretty much compile it yourself (seemingly definitely). Why isn't this packaged as just a simple app? I don't see why a PDF editing and viewing tool should need so much technological know-how to be well-used. I feel that this just adds a significant barrier of entry for those who are less technologically inclined. Are there any plans (if enough funding were to be received) to turn this into a stand-alone, relatively easy-to-install desktop application, much like Acrobat? Any responses are appreciated! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
If you have many Users it has a few advantages with running it as a web-application. You can run updates by updating a single instance and from my point of view it is much faster as a web-application than some complex desktop applications. You can also make it accessible to many different clients without the need of creating a different installation for every operating system |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So few things You don't need to compile it yourself The reason we recommend docker for this app, is that when standalone it's functionality is reduced. If you were to download the .exe today and run it We have thought about having the .exe version open up a app not web browser (there are tools to do this such as 'electron') |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
So few things
You don't need to compile it yourself
All release artifacts are attached to each release
A .jar and .exe if you wish to run it standalone
The reason we recommend docker for this app, is that when standalone it's functionality is reduced.
If installed with docker it actually installs several apps that work with Stirling pdf to enhance its functionality (such as adding docx to pdf conversions etc)
If you were to download the .exe today and run it
You would get a website opening up with our "ultra-lite" version which has 80% of the full functionality but mises some advanced features
We have thought about having the .exe version open up a app not web browser (there are tools to …