JOSS review: yarn test fails

[Luthaf]

What I did:

git clone git@github.com:ToyotaResearchInstitute/materialnet.git
cd materialnet
yarn install
yarn test
# press a to run all tests

What I got

 FAIL  src/App.test.js
  ● Test suite failed to run

    Jest encountered an unexpected token

    This usually means that you are trying to import a file which Jest cannot parse, e.g. it's not plain JavaScript.

    By default, if Jest sees a Babel config, it will use that to transform your files, ignoring "node_modules".

    Here's what you can do:
     • To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
     • If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
     • If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.

    You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/en/configuration.html

    Details:

    /local/scratch/fraux/code/tests/materialnet/node_modules/lodash-es/lodash.js:10
    export { default as add } from './add.js';
    ^^^^^^

    SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'export'

       9 | import MenuItem from '@material-ui/core/MenuItem';
      10 | import CancelIcon from '@material-ui/icons/Cancel';
    > 11 | import { deburr } from 'lodash-es';
         | ^
      12 | import { ListItemText, ListItemSecondaryAction } from '@material-ui/core';
      13 | 
      14 | // BASED on https://material-ui.com/components/autocomplete/

      at ScriptTransformer._transformAndBuildScript (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/script_transformer.js:403:17)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/components/controls/reactselect.js:11:1)

Test Suites: 1 failed, 1 total
Tests:       0 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        4.044s
Ran all test suites.

System information: Ubuntu 18.04, node 13.8.0, yarn 1.22.0.

[waxlamp]

This is actually just the stub testing infrastructure, which we are not using. See #173 (which I just opened to solve this problem).

[Luthaf]

Ok!