Dates comparison by isDataEqual #433
-
Hi :) In 1.3.0 I've noticed that Theoretically, What do you think? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I think dates are a safe one to include, mostly because json.parse will sometimes auto create dates from strings |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
How about we inline it instead. Saves .2kb ;)
…On May 2, 2020, 6:57 AM -0600, Andrew Cherniavskii ***@***.***>, wrote:
What do you think about adding fast-deep-equal as dependency?
There's 4 additional lines of code in original fast-deep-equal, and dates support is one of them.
Also, we wouldn't need to write tests for it
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think dates are a safe one to include, mostly because json.parse will sometimes auto create dates from strings