Replies: 1 comment
-
Its hard to give a general answer as to what will work better. Most likely it is test case specific. Feel free to try and see. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As a general strategy, would it make sense to exhaust the current level of detail when a failure is found, rather than start bisecting at the top?
It found something to chop away here:
Then it started bisecting at the top again, before finally finding something to chop away here.
So all that chopping away from the top was wasted, in this case.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions