You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT seems to behave differently than java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT when parsing timestamps:
org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2023-08-11T23:08:44.848+00:30' could not be parsed at index 23
at org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter.parseToBuilder(DateTimeFormatter.java:1588)
at org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter.parse(DateTimeFormatter.java:1416)
org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT
seems to behave differently thanjava.time.format.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT
when parsing timestamps:Error message:
This seems to be related to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8166138 which addressed the issue in Java 12.
The question is whether ThreeTenBP should be a backport of the Java 8
java.time
classes or if these newer additions should also be covered.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: