You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hmm, I'd really rather wait until we have an alpha tagged, as otherwise we risk builds failing on this project. But if you want to work on a draft PR, and it doesn't add too much complexity to things, I would consider it!
The only piece missing is that if DRUPAL_VERSION = 11.x, we should require drush/drush:13.x-dev in Dockerfile.
Even if not tagged, providing a version for 11.x could be useful. Soon people might want to test against 11.x HEAD before release.
I wanted to give it a try, so looking at the Makefile and playing with jq ended up with:
curl --silent https://api.github.com/repos/drupal/recommended-project/tags | jq '.|= . +[{"name":"11.x@dev"}]' | jq -r '.[].name'
Then I noticed I would need to skip this one for not marking it as latest, etc, etc, and ended up just trying:
docker build --build-arg DRUPAL_VERSION=11.x@dev --build-arg PHP_VERSION=8.3 -t q0rban/tugboat-drupal:11.x .
and it worked!
So maybe this should just be an adhoc target?
The only piece missing is that if DRUPAL_VERSION = 11.x, we should require drush/drush:13.x-dev in Dockerfile.
Is this a good idea? Even if being a moving target, don't think people would expect 11.x image to be stable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: