Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

Is the new way of extending the service configuration compatible with deployments using the previous approach? #15

Closed
p-j-smith opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@p-j-smith
Copy link
Contributor

In #13 the way service definitions are extended was changed so that this role works on RHEL 9. Essentially the configuration has moved from:

/etc/systemd/system/{{ postgresql_service_name }}.service

to:

/etc/systemd/system/{{ postgresql_service_name }}.service.d/postgresql_service.conf

This is fine for new installs, but could there be any issues if there's already a configuration defined in the previous location?

@p-j-smith
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep, it seems to work okay

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant