You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many languages in Low Land South America distinguish reality status (realis and irrealis) and illocutionary force, so that e.g. indicative mood is a combination of reality status and declarative illocutionary force (see Van Valin and LaPolla 1997). There is literature on the topic. Mood=irrealis/realis does not work for such languages, because reality status markers cooccur with mood markers. Realis and irrealis are not mood categories.
In a number of Arawak languages south of the Amazon, ‘reality status’ is a prominent feature. This category is independent from speech acts (or moods). (Aikhenvald 2012: 190)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many languages in Low Land South America distinguish reality status (realis and irrealis) and illocutionary force, so that e.g. indicative mood is a combination of reality status and declarative illocutionary force (see Van Valin and LaPolla 1997). There is literature on the topic. Mood=irrealis/realis does not work for such languages, because reality status markers cooccur with mood markers. Realis and irrealis are not mood categories.
In a number of Arawak languages south of the Amazon, ‘reality status’ is a prominent feature. This category is independent from speech acts (or moods). (Aikhenvald 2012: 190)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: