Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map - slim down Donut marker config panel to a reasonable width #426

Closed
5 tasks
bobular opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #491
Closed
5 tasks

Map - slim down Donut marker config panel to a reasonable width #426

bobular opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #491
Assignees

Comments

@bobular
Copy link
Member

bobular commented Aug 16, 2023

Thanks to #403 the user will see the map and the marker config on first entry. It would be good if we can minimise how much of the map is obscured by the panel.

In the screenshot below we can see that the "Binning method" radio buttons are very wide and do not even need to be there for categoricals.

Tasks and things to consider

  • remove Binning method radio buttons for variable types that don't need it (presumably categorical)
  • narrow the radio buttons for when they are needed - the default featured variable could be continuous
  • Remove the "Donut marker controls" heading? It doesn't save any width but it does save height and is not telling the user anything useful
  • Think about long variable names in the variable picker (max width/ellipsis if not already implemented?)
  • Think about long value names (in the categorical config table) (ellipsis or wrap?)

image

@moontrip moontrip self-assigned this Aug 29, 2023
@rwiecknd rwiecknd changed the title Map - slim down bubble marker config panel to a reasonable width Map - slim down Donut marker config panel to a reasonable width Aug 29, 2023
@moontrip moontrip linked a pull request Sep 11, 2023 that will close this issue
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants