-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lcesave.hexpat: use Virtual Filesystem + ZLib support + auto endian detection #309
Conversation
import std.mem; | ||
import std.core; | ||
import hex.dec; | ||
#ifdef __IMHEX__ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where does the __IMHEX__
define come from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is defined internally before pattern is evaluated. All patterns have it. In the source code you will find it in content_registry.cpp line 612
runtime.addDefine("__IMHEX__");
runtime.addDefine("__IMHEX_VERSION__", ImHexApi::System::getImHexVersion());
Patterns shouldn't test for it, that's done internally in includes\hex\impl\imhex_check.pat
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DexrnZacAttack, why are you testing for this define?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It isn't my place to reply since you asked the author directly, but note that the commit that adds the test for the define has "ifdefs to fix actions moment " as comment, so I suspect that it has to do with unit tests which wouldn't define the IMHEX variable because tests don't use the runtime. Also it would make little sense to warn user during a test run which is supposed to run automatically.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Paxcut.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Paxcut.
Just saw this thread, yes this is the case, as the actions stuff was failing without that check.
Thank you! |
No description provided.