You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am running Dereplicator+ on an .MGF file derived from negative mode data. The input file contains negative charges, however, the results only show positive ion mode adducts.
I have reviewed the Dereplicator+ paper, which states:
"To assess the capability of DEREPLICATOR+ in identifying compounds in the negative ionization modes, we analyzed 341 additional spectra in the GNPS spectral library collected in the ESI (-) mode. DEREPLICATOR+ search correctly identified 88 (26%) of these compounds as top predictions (Supplementary Data 9)."
This statement suggests that Dereplicator+ is capable of analyzing data in negative ionization mode (ESI-).
Could you please provide guidance on how to address this issue and obtain correct adduct predictions for my negative mode data?
Thank you in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I am running Dereplicator+ on an .MGF file derived from negative mode data. The input file contains negative charges, however, the results only show positive ion mode adducts.
I have reviewed the Dereplicator+ paper, which states:
"To assess the capability of DEREPLICATOR+ in identifying compounds in the negative ionization modes, we analyzed 341 additional spectra in the GNPS spectral library collected in the ESI (-) mode. DEREPLICATOR+ search correctly identified 88 (26%) of these compounds as top predictions (Supplementary Data 9)."
This statement suggests that Dereplicator+ is capable of analyzing data in negative ionization mode (ESI-).
Could you please provide guidance on how to address this issue and obtain correct adduct predictions for my negative mode data?
Thank you in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: