Different result on extracting tarball

[willysr]

please take a look on gem submission on ARCHIVE
I ran sbo-bot and it got pushed to SlackBuildsOrg/slackbuilds#8742
it shows that no rc.gem exists, but when i look into the tarball in ARCHIVE, it does exists

willysr@home:~$ tar xvf /data/repo/sbo/ARCHIVE/gem.tar.gz 
gem/
gem/gem.info
gem/gem.8
gem/gem.SlackBuild
gem/doinst.sh
gem/README
gem/slack-desc
gem/rc.gem

[aclemons]

The sbo repo has a gitignore on all gem files (rubygems): https://github.com/SlackBuildsOrg/slackbuilds/blob/0068f2d957c654d284d3c95f1df237a72eb8a494/.gitignore#L14

So git add . does not add it:

sbo-bot/bin/generate-submission-prs.sh

Line 84 in 48014e3

git add .

[aclemons]

We could change it to force add everything and ignore the gitignore. Then if there is some rubbish, we'd just need to update the PR while reviewing.

Should we make that change?

[willysr]

ah, didn't think of that
i think i was the one who added that entry in gitignore
since there's only 1 entry who had issue, i think we can change the name of the rc.gem into something else to avoid the .gitignore entry