Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plot richness vs. ngal for matched clusters in RM and WaZP #1

Open
chihway opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Plot richness vs. ngal for matched clusters in RM and WaZP #1

chihway opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@chihway
Copy link
Collaborator

chihway commented Mar 5, 2019

These two quantities should be correlated, but by how much?

@ajamsellem
Copy link
Owner

Richness_Ngal_compare_(RM_Err)

@ajamsellem
Copy link
Owner

Richness_Ngal_compare_(WaZP_Err)

@ajamsellem
Copy link
Owner

Although the reduced χ2 values for both of these fits are on the order of 1, the models seem to diverge at higher richness/galaxy numbers. Do we expect more spread about the fit at higher richness?

@chihway
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chihway commented Mar 11, 2019

Can you maybe bin the points or plot it transparent? it's a little hard to tell when all the points are overlapped. Interesting that the high mass clusters are more different and RM has systematically more "counts" compared to WaZP. Naively I might expect the opposite since RM only counts red galaxies... but there are many many factors, so prob not a big deal.

This is a good start -- we can imagine making some equivalent richness selection in ngal, it will be noisy given the scatter, but it's something to start with.

@ajamsellem
Copy link
Owner

ajamsellem commented Mar 13, 2019

Richness_Ngal_compare_(Hist)
Richness_Ngal_compare_(Hist_small)

Maybe this is a better illustration of the data. The binning in each plot are labeled according to the tick marks on the axes. There were so few data points above 70 on the x-axis and 100 on the y-axis, that these parts of the data were not included (because you couldn't tell that those regions were non-trivial anyway). I also include a zoom-in of the dense region of Ngals = (5,10) and Richness = (5,15). Note that there are no richness or Ngal values below 5.

I think this plot bolsters your point that there will be quite a bit of scatter. If there was no scatter at all, we would see a nice diagonal line (of square bins) from the bottom left to the top right of the plot. There is noticeable departure from such an ideal.

@chihway
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chihway commented Mar 26, 2019

In the first plot above, was the binning in log-space? I'm a little confused why there are relatively few galaxies in the area number count and richness 10-20?

Also, can you make the same plot for clusters with richness 20-100? This is the sample used for the Y1 splashback measurement.

In any case, let's ask Ricardo whether the lack of scatter is expected.

@ajamsellem
Copy link
Owner

image
Revised 2d histogram with log colorbar.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants