-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plot richness vs. ngal for matched clusters in RM and WaZP #1
Comments
Although the reduced χ2 values for both of these fits are on the order of 1, the models seem to diverge at higher richness/galaxy numbers. Do we expect more spread about the fit at higher richness? |
Can you maybe bin the points or plot it transparent? it's a little hard to tell when all the points are overlapped. Interesting that the high mass clusters are more different and RM has systematically more "counts" compared to WaZP. Naively I might expect the opposite since RM only counts red galaxies... but there are many many factors, so prob not a big deal. This is a good start -- we can imagine making some equivalent richness selection in ngal, it will be noisy given the scatter, but it's something to start with. |
Maybe this is a better illustration of the data. The binning in each plot are labeled according to the tick marks on the axes. There were so few data points above 70 on the x-axis and 100 on the y-axis, that these parts of the data were not included (because you couldn't tell that those regions were non-trivial anyway). I also include a zoom-in of the dense region of Ngals = (5,10) and Richness = (5,15). Note that there are no richness or Ngal values below 5. I think this plot bolsters your point that there will be quite a bit of scatter. If there was no scatter at all, we would see a nice diagonal line (of square bins) from the bottom left to the top right of the plot. There is noticeable departure from such an ideal. |
In the first plot above, was the binning in log-space? I'm a little confused why there are relatively few galaxies in the area number count and richness 10-20? Also, can you make the same plot for clusters with richness 20-100? This is the sample used for the Y1 splashback measurement. In any case, let's ask Ricardo whether the lack of scatter is expected. |
These two quantities should be correlated, but by how much?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: