-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
exchange block file #50
Comments
It should most certainly have worked if you followed the examples in the paper. In particular, Figure 1 (c): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.092 |
Thank you for your quick reply. As you suggested, we read the paper and made the eb file based on Figure1(c), however the palm_permidx.csv showed Figure1(a) manner. this is my code palm -i only_fc_data.csv -d design_matrix.csv -t contrast.csv -eb eb.csv -fdr -quiet -savemax -savemetrics -saveparametric -saveperms -savedof Is there any other Tips to make eb file? |
It could be that the permutations that whould shuffle the 2nd column are not informative for your hypothesis, as defined by design and contrasts. PALM will skip these permutations. If you want to run these nonetheless, try adding the option -cmcx. |
Thank you for your reply. |
I have an additional question. I'm looking to test for interaction effects in repeated measures data (Time 1, Time 2) for two groups (Group A and Group B). In this case, as I mentioned earlier, I am considering applying permutation using within-block (Time 1, Time 2) and whole-block (ID). Is this approach to permutation correct? |
I'm attempting permutations within-block and whole-block design using an eb file (file was csv file.). I created the eb file with:
The first column containing all values as 1 (all positive values)
The second column with IDs (all positive values)
The third column with values of either 1 or 2 (all positive values)
However, when I look at the palm_permidx.csv, it appears that only the elements in the third column have been shuffled.
(I want to shuffle the data based on second and third columns data, in within-block and whole-block design manner)
Am I doing something wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: