Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lazy-load components #176

Open
jelbourn opened this issue Jun 7, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Lazy-load components #176

jelbourn opened this issue Jun 7, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

jelbourn commented Jun 7, 2017

  1. First step will be to only load the docs-site specific components as necessary (e.g., example-viewer)
  2. Follow-up will be to load only the material components and examples that are used in the current view. This part will be tricky because all of the individual component pages are loaded through example-viewer.
@Splaktar Splaktar self-assigned this Dec 30, 2019
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2019
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2019
- update a couple services to use `providedIn: 'root'`

Relates to #176
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2019
- update a couple services to use `providedIn: 'root'`

Relates to #176
@Splaktar
Copy link
Member

PR #698 starts down the path of lazy loading our documentation components and demonstrates some of the issues with the current implementation of ComponentViewer, DocViewer, and ExampleViewer.

Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2020
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2020
- update a couple services to use `providedIn: 'root'`

Relates to #176
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2020
Splaktar added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2020
- update a couple services to use `providedIn: 'root'`

Relates to #176
jelbourn pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2020
Also updates a couple services to use `providedIn: 'root'`

Relates to #176
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants