Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
|
I'd say this is pretty much superseded by historic now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ok, that makes sense. I might try to draft some historic documentation then
(as part of my learning process--no worries if it proves unworthy for
pulling into the docs for real).
…On Sat, Aug 6, 2022, 10:35 AM Owen Campbell ***@***.***> wrote:
I'd say this is pretty much superseded by historic now.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#84 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB63GLA4FH5NGJWBXXZQIYLVX2A25ANCNFSM55YZO5EA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Also, it doesn't take into account the new accelerated tables. Perhaps, if I thought that through properly and implemented whatever changes are necessary, I could resurrect this alongside historic, but I just don't have the time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ok, that makes sense. I'm also not likely to have time to work drafting historic docs anytime foreseeable either, sadly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@meatballs, do you see 'historic' as a replacement for 'anvil_orm', or as something complementary? Mostly I'm wondering whether it's worth taking some time to learn 'anvil_orm' at this point and contribute to its docs.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions