Update genjavadoc #1187
Merged
Update genjavadoc #1187
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mdedetrich
requested review from
raboof,
gmethvin,
He-Pin,
nvollmar,
samueleresca,
pjfanning,
Roiocam and
jxnu-liguobin
mdedetrich
force-pushed
the
update-genjavadoc
branch
from
be0d77f
to
7691d9e
Compare
raboof
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
jxnu-liguobin
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While this project didn't exhibit the issue with genjavadoc now, since its using Scala 2.13.13 we should update to the latest version of genjavadoc so we don't get any surprises in the future.
Note that this is also safe to backport to 1.0.x because the only notable changes between genjavadoc 0.18 and 0.19 is the fix for Scala 2.13.13