Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delayed appearance of packages on the Archive #131

Open
christian-heusel opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Delayed appearance of packages on the Archive #131

christian-heusel opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@christian-heusel
Copy link
Member

In the context of archlinux/infrastructure#531 we are currently thinking about whether packages appearing on the Archive with some delay could cause issues for the repro infrastructure 🤔

As far as we understand it right now the packages are exclusively synced from the archive:

ARCHIVEURL="${ARCH_ARCHIVE_CACHE:-https://archive.archlinux.org/packages}"

readonly archive_url="${ARCH_ARCHIVE_CACHE:-https://archive.archlinux.org/packages}"

In the new setup that could cause some issues if the rebuilder picks up the package faster than it is synced to the archive. So we wanted to ask about input to this, would it be good just to add a fallback to the T0 or geo mirrors? Or some kind of retry mechanism..? 🤔

@Foxboron
Copy link
Member

I think we could query both URLs. We already have code for this as we need to check for xz and zst extensions to files.

So if devops needs to delay sync, we can implement this :) No worries.

@kpcyrd
Copy link
Member

kpcyrd commented Jun 24, 2024

I also think it'd be fine, the scheduler part of the repro infra has a retry mechanism, so if the first attempt fails it's going to try again after some time.

This was also common back when we had to wait until the PKGBUILD became available in the svntogit repo. It causes a "Packages which have become not reproducible" email notification though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants