diff --git a/citations/views.py b/citations/views.py
index 42d69ef..166a564 100644
--- a/citations/views.py
+++ b/citations/views.py
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 from django.shortcuts import render
 from django.contrib.auth.decorators import login_required
+from django.db.models import Q
 from django.http import HttpResponseRedirect
 from django.utils import timezone
 from django.contrib import messages
@@ -13,8 +14,23 @@
 def index(request):
     template = 'citations.html'
 
+    ## On October 28 2024, SCOTUS touched hundreds of old opinions, triggering thousdands of "new" citation
+    ## ingests.  I no longer have time to maintain this strictly. It's hihgly unlikely they were changing
+    ## citation data. As such, the best bet for now is to simply hide these citations, because I can't verify
+    ## them all.  If this happens again, we should add a new "ignore" field to opinions, and batch ignore
+    ## citations for flagged opinions. Yes, this is brute force and inelligant, but I simply don't have the time.
+
+    ## Show all citations
+    # citations = Citation.objects.all().order_by('-opinion__id')
+
+    ## Show only citations from opinions discovered on problem date
+    # citations = Citation.objects.filter(opinion_id__discovered__range=["2024-10-28", "2024-10-29"]).order_by('-opinion__id')
+
+    ## Show all citations EXCEPT those published on problem date when thousand of old files were touched
+    citations = Citation.objects.filter(~Q(opinion_id__discovered__range=["2024-10-28", "2024-10-29"])).order_by('-opinion__id')
+
     context = {
-        'citations': Citation.objects.all().order_by('-opinion__id'),
+        'citations': citations,
         'statuses': dict(Citation.STATUSES),
     }