You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The solutions also seem to indicate that this is the case, cause the second goal in the = exercise is solved almost identically to the ⊆ exercise. Is that correct? If so, I wonder if the ⊆ exercise is kind of redundant. Maybe it's not though, if the intention is to highlight the relationship between = and ⊆ proofs in general? Sorry to bug you if this is intentional, was curious though so I thought I'd ask.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! First, thanks for making this, it has been a really great way to start learning Lean!
I have a quick question about two of the exercises in chapter 4, section 2. This exercise here:
mathematics_in_lean_source/MIL/C04_Sets_and_Functions/S02_Functions.lean
Line 153 in 9cef4f7
...appears to be just one of the directions of the previous exercise:
mathematics_in_lean_source/MIL/C04_Sets_and_Functions/S02_Functions.lean
Line 150 in 9cef4f7
The solutions also seem to indicate that this is the case, cause the second goal in the
=
exercise is solved almost identically to the⊆
exercise. Is that correct? If so, I wonder if the⊆
exercise is kind of redundant. Maybe it's not though, if the intention is to highlight the relationship between=
and⊆
proofs in general? Sorry to bug you if this is intentional, was curious though so I thought I'd ask.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: