Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): 2.167.0 #32095

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

chore(release): 2.167.0 #32095

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

otaviomacedo
Copy link
Contributor

See CHANGELOG

This PR updates the CDK CLI to use the AWS SDK V3 instead of V2.

### Manual Test Cases for Authorization
All tests were run verbosely so that I could manually check the
credentials being used from the CLI output.

- [x] No credentials setup and no default profile fails as expected
(established to ensure nothing was unintentionally setup)
- [x] Explicitly provided profile sourced from config file, tested with
both `--profile` and `AWS_PROFILE`
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key`
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key` and `region`
- [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to another profile
with `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key` in both config and
credentials
  - [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to Environment
- [x] `source_profile` that and `role_arn` that points to SSO profile in
both config and credentials
- [x] SSO both using all fields in `[profile]` and split between
`[sso-session]` and `[profile]`
  - [x] `credential_source` is Environment
  - [x] `credential_process`
- [x] Explicitly provided profile sourced from  credentials file
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key`
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key` and `region`
- [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to another profile
with `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key` in both config and
credentials
  - [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to Environment
- [x] `source_profile` that and `role_arn` that points to SSO profile in
both config and credentials
  - [x]  `credential_source` is Environment
  - [x] `credential_source` is EcsContainer (integ tests in CodeBuild)
  - [x] `credential_process`
- [x] Default profile (in both config file and credentials file)
- [x] `AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID` and `AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY` environment
variables set (cleared after test)
- [x] `AMAZON_ACCESS_KEY_ID` and `AMAZON_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY` environment
variables set (cleared after test)
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key`
  - [x] `aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key` and `region`
- [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to a profile with
`aws_access_key_id` and `aws_secret_access_key`
- [x] `source_profile` and `role_arn` that points to Environment (this
will use `fromEnv` prior to getting to looking for `source_profile` in
the Ini file)
  - [x] SSO profile is setup as default
  - [x] `credential_process`

Closes #25870, #26292, #20956, #24744, #27265, 20896.

### Reason for this change

The AWS SDK V2 is now in maintenance mode.

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*

---------

Co-authored-by: Otavio Macedo <288203+otaviomacedo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rico Huijbers <rix0rrr@gmail.com>

(cherry picked from commit 5bc0662)
@otaviomacedo otaviomacedo added the pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it label Nov 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Nov 12, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team November 12, 2024 13:24
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Nov 12, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ CLI code has changed. A maintainer must run the code through the testing pipeline (git fetch origin pull/32095/head && git push -f origin FETCH_HEAD:test-main-pipeline), then add the 'pr-linter/cli-integ-tested' label when the pipeline succeeds.

PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review.

If you would like to request an exemption from the status checks or clarification on feedback, please leave a comment on this PR containing Exemption Request and/or Clarification Request.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

➡️ PR build request submitted to test-main-pipeline ⬅️

A maintainer must now check the pipeline and add the pr-linter/cli-integ-tested label once the pipeline succeeds.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 3a1f352
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants