You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does this mean that C&C servers were on these networks or they were compromised, Or ignored? It would be more weird if they are explicitly ignored networks.
These are the unique IPs that anything under those domains resolved to. Before March-April of this year they were parking IPs. After that unless there was a cname, they were just where domains beaconed to while they were not actively being interacted with.
These are the unique IPs that anything under those domains resolved to. Before March-April of this year they were parking IPs. After that unless there was a cname, they were just where domains beaconed to while they were not actively being interacted with.
So that begs the question, Why so many for Traiana Inc and Nokia.
I am curious, about ipv4-addresses.txt, What is that and why are so many of the IP's owned by two companies in particular.
Traiana Inc and Nokia.
https://www.cmegroup.com/services/traiana.html
Does this mean that C&C servers were on these networks or they were compromised, Or ignored? It would be more weird if they are explicitly ignored networks.
More details here.
https://github.com/tg12/badrep_report/blob/master/Solarwinds_SUNBURST_Backdoor_hosts.csv
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: