Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dynesty attribution #304

Closed
segasai opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

dynesty attribution #304

segasai opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@segasai
Copy link

segasai commented Dec 5, 2023

Hi,

Noticing a few recent papers relying on prospector and dynesty, I noticed that they refer to Speagle+2020 paper, but do not cite the actual code as we ask here
https://dynesty.readthedocs.io/en/latest/references.html or here https://github.com/joshspeagle/dynesty/#readme . However there was a big effort in making dynesty much more robust over last few years, so if 2.+ version is used, it would be great to properly acknowledge it. Could you maybe link to the dynesty reference page or ask to follow dynesty instructions of how to acknowledge it.

Thanks,
Sergey

@bd-j
Copy link
Owner

bd-j commented Dec 6, 2023

Hi @segasai

Thanks for all the work on dynesty, much appreciated. Happy to add more detailed citation info in the docs. In #305 I've merged in a new top-level citation section in the docs with a link to the dynesty reference page and direction to cite all dependencies, https://prospect.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ref.html

@segasai
Copy link
Author

segasai commented Dec 6, 2023

Thank you!

@segasai segasai closed this as completed Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants