-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Need for more comprehensive integration testing #112
Comments
@fabianegli thanks for pointing out this. This is the most important thing missing in the repo and small task that can be tackle. We should have a collection in the tests for CI/CD. As I mentioned to you before, most of the datasets already annotated are datasets has been post annotated by the team, then some metadata is missing. However, we have good examples already @qinchunyuan than we can start adding here in this issue by topic. |
Good idea @fabianegli. There are some examples covering different types.
|
Just linking the tests from in jsdrf as reference. |
@ypriverol Do you have a set of SDRF files for experiments of all different kinds of expected flavors?
If not we should systematically generate SDRF example files with all the different labelling techniques, fractionations, biological and technical replicates, file names (spaces/weird characters, if allowable) to have test cases for at least the most common experimental setups. Based on those we can then generate examples of SDRF files that do not comply with the standard, but should be readable nonetheless and some that are wrong in various ways we expect users to mess up writing SDRF files with common tools or even by hand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: