Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

db.h dependency #350

Open
lskatz opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

db.h dependency #350

lskatz opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@lskatz
Copy link
Contributor

lskatz commented Nov 3, 2020

In my own CI unit testing, I install bioperl as a dependency. However, it is difficult to make sure that bioperl installs. I am pretty sure that that BerkeleyDB (Ubuntu:libberkeleydb-perl) and ubuntu:libdb-dev is a dependency. Could it be documented somewhere?

https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libberkeleydb-perl
https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libdb-dev

@cjfields
Copy link
Member

cjfields commented Feb 3, 2021

Can you confirm that you are running into issues when either of these is not installed? We have largely switched to AnyDBM_File but it's possible DB_File is still in there somewhere (it's still showing up as a dependency); BerkeleyDB shouldn't be required though. See this page:

https://metacpan.org/release/BioPerl

@carandraug
Copy link
Member

Looking at the Changes files, I see that in version 1.6.924 the dependency on DB_File was demoted from "required" to "recommended". My guess is that demotion was lost in version 1.7.3 with the move to dzil.

However, looking at the code and despite this demotion, there's modules (and programs as well) that still use DB_File without working around its absence so I'm not sure if that demotion is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants