Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rethink naming of configuration parameters #15

Open
brendanzab opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Rethink naming of configuration parameters #15

brendanzab opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@brendanzab
Copy link
Owner

brendanzab commented Apr 25, 2017 •
edited
Loading

At the moment we have:

  • ApproxEq::Epsilon
  • epsilon
  • max_relative
  • max_ulps

But I'm not sure how descriptive these are. Any other ideas? I'm also wondering if the type of max_ulps should be associated...

Related: #8 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brendanzab